ISRAEL,JOHN MACARTHUR
This message by John MacArthur is one of the most needed today.
ISRAEL,JOHN MACARTHUR
This message by John MacArthur is one of the most needed today.
Posted in Uncategorized
b1.Why every Calvinist should be a premillennialist
Posted in Uncategorized
b2 Why every Calvinist should be a premillennialist
Posted in Uncategorized
b3.Why every Calvinist should be a premillennialist
Posted in Uncategorized
b4.Why every Calvinist should be a premillennialist
Posted in Uncategorized
Sanctified Affliction Seldom Seems Sanctified
If you are going through a dark and difficult time I pray that this video will encourage you
Posted in Uncategorized
The 4 Primary Arguments for God’s Existence
by Michael J. Vlach, Ph.D.
Perhaps the hottest topic in all of philosophy concerns the existence of God. Thus the question—“Does God exist?”
Our answer to this question affects how we view the world, how we behave, and what we expect for the future.
If God exists, then we are probably accountable to this God. The universe may have meaning and purpose. Plus, our own existence may not cease at physical death. If God does not exist, however, then we are probably here by chance and are not accountable to some transcendent being. This life may be all we have, so live your life however you see fit and enjoy it.
Traditionally, there have been four major arguments for God’s existence: (1) the cosmological argument; (2) the teleological argument; (3) the ontological argument; and (4) the moral law argument. Below are explanations of each of the arguments and the common responses to them.
1. Cosmological Argument
The term “cosmological” comes from the Greek word “kosmos” which means “world.”
The cosmological argument for God’s existence goes like this: The world could not exist on its own so there must have been a first cause that brought it into being. This first cause is God. Or put another way, the universe could not just exist on its own—someone or something must have made it. This cause of the universe is God.
Three criticisms of the cosmological argument have been offered. First, some say matter is eternal and is not in need of a “first cause.” Second, some say “If everything needs a cause, what caused God?” Third, some say that even if it is true that some being caused our universe to exist, this does not prove the existence of the Christian God. All it shows is that there is some powerful being that created the universe, but this does not necessarily mean that this creator was the God of the Bible.
2. Teleological Argument
The teleological argument is also known as “the argument from design” (The Greek word “telos” means “purpose” or “design.”). The argument goes like this: The universe evidences great complexity or design; thus, it must have been designed by a great Designer or God.
The argument from design can be likened to a watch. A watch is obviously made by a watchmaker. The world, which is much more complex than a watch, must also have been designed by a great Designer or Divine Watchmaker (God).
In sum, the teleological argument asserts that the universe evidences too much complexity to be the product of random chance. We know that the celestial bodies move with perfect accuracy in their orbits. Our bodies, too, are incredibly complex. According to the teleological argument, there’s just no way all this complexity could “just happen.” God must have created it all.
There have been three responses to the teleological argument. First, some say the teleological argument is guilty of a “weak analogy” because it assumes a significant resemblance between natural objects (ex. rocks, trees) and objects we know have been designed (ex. watches, skyscrapers). Thus, comparing natural objects with objects we know have been created by humans is like comparing apples and oranges. The analogy just doesn’t work. Second, some say that the theories of the big bang and evolution better explain the complexity in the universe. Third, some say that even if the teleological argument is true, it does not prove the existence of the Christian God.
3. Ontological Argument
The third argument for God’s existence is the ontological argument. This argument is unlike the cosmological and teleological arguments in that it does not argue from evidence in the natural world. Thus, it is not a “cause and effect” argument.
The ontological argument can be stated in this way: “God is the greatest being imaginable. One of the aspects of perfection or greatness is existence. Thus, God exists.” Or put another way—“The fact that God can be conceived means that he must exist.”
This argument for God’s existence was developed by the twelfth century theologian and philosopher, Anselm. It is based on Anselm’s declaration that God is “that which nothing greater can be conceived.”
The ontological argument has been very controversial. Even many who believe in God’s existence question its validity. A contemporary of Anselm named Guanilo responded to Anselm. Guanilo said that one could imagine a perfect island but that did not mean a perfect island exists. Others have said you can imagine a unicorn but that does not mean unicorns exist. Thus, many challenge the idea that the idea of God must mean that God exists.
4. Moral Law Argument
Another argument for the existence of God is the moral law argument. It goes like this: Without God morality would be impossible. There must be a Lawgiver (God) who originates and stands by moral law. A universal moral law cannot exist accidentally. There must be a basis behind it—God.
According to this view, every person is born with an inherent understanding of right and wrong. Everyone, for instance, understands that killing an innocent person is wrong. Everyone understands that helping a drowning person is right. Where did this internal understanding of right and wrong come from? According to adherents of the moral law argument, this understanding comes from God. He put it into the hearts of every person.
There have been two responses to the moral law argument. First, some deny that there are universal truths. Many today believe that truth is subjective and relative. Societies and individuals determine what is true for them, but there is no God that does this. Second, some say that the presence of evil in the world argues against a Moral Lawgiver. If God is all-powerful and all-good, how can evil exist in the world?
The arguments and counterarguments for God’s existence remain controversial. The cosmological, teleological, and moral law arguments remain popular with Christian apologists today. The ontological argument is not as well received although some today still asserts its validity.
It should be noted that most Christian theologians and philosophers believe that God never intended for his existence to be something that could be proven with 100% certainty. They point out that faith is an important component in understanding God and his existence.
Posted in Uncategorized
HANDY LITTLE CHART – GOD HAS A POSITIVE ANSWER:
| YOU SAY | GOD SAYS | BIBLE VERSES |
| You say: ’It’s impossible’ | God says: All things are possible | (Luke 18:27) |
| You say: ’I'm too tired’ | God says: I will give you rest | (Matthew 11:28-30) |
| You say: ’Nobody really loves me’ | God says: I love you | (John 3:1 6 & John 3:34 ) |
| You say: ’I can’t go on’ | God says: My grace is sufficient | (II Corinthians 12:9 & Psalm 91:15) |
| You say: ’I can’t figure things out’ | God says: I will direct your steps | (Proverbs 3:5- 6) |
| You say: ’I can’t do it’ | God says: You can do all things | (Philippians 4:13) |
| You say: ’I'm not able’ | God says: I am able | (II Corinthians 9:8) |
| You say: ‘It’s not worth it’ | God says: It will be worth it | (Roman 8:28 ) |
| You say: ’I can’t forgive myself’ | God says: I Forgive you | (I John 1:9 & Romans 8:1) |
| You say: ’I can’t manage’ | God says: I will supply all your needs | (Philippians 4:19) |
| You say: ’I'm afraid’ | God says: I have not given you a spirit of fear | (II Timothy 1:7) |
| You say: ’I'm always worried and frustrated’ | God says: Cast all your cares on ME | (I Peter 5:7) |
| You say: ’I'm not smart enough’ | God says: I give you wisdom | (I Corinthians 1:30) |
| You say: ’I feel all alone’ | God says: I will never leave you or forsake you | (Hebrews 13:5) |
Posted in Uncategorized
Many Thanks to www.ondoctrine.com for the following
THEOLOGICAL TERMINOLOGY
DICTIONARY
| The following are terms used in religious circles and in writings about religious subjects. Some terminology may have slightly different meanings depending on the point of view, but every effort has been made to make the definitions as clear and accurate as possible. A Abaddon (Hebrew) – Apollyon (Greek) Destruction, abyss. In Job 26:6, the place of the dead. In Revelation 9:11 the angel of the bottomless pit, perhaps the chief of Satan’s angels.absolution (Latin) Freeing from guilt or obligation, remission of sin or its penalty. The Catholic doctrine of releasing a person from sin by God, through the means of a priest. An aberrant doctrine in relation to orthodox belief which asserts that only God and Jesus Christ may forgive sins. adoption (Latin) Advent (Latin) agnostic (Greek) amillennialism (Latin) Amyraldism (Latin) animism (Latin) anthropomorphism (Greek) anthropopathism (Greek) antinomian (Latin – Greek) Apollyon (Greek) – Abaddon (Hebrew) apologetics (Latin – Greek) a priori (Latin) Arminianism The logical order of God’s decrees in Arminian theology are as follows: B Baptism (Latin) An ordinance commanded by Jesus Christ. It is a procedure that should be performed by all Christian believers. It is an affirmation of faith in Jesus Christ. There are two views regarding the method: (1) Sprinkling of water on the top of a person’s head. (2) Immersion of the entire body in water. In spite of claims that sprinkling is the preferred manner, it is clear in Scripture that immersion was the procedure used. See: paedobaptism – baptism of infants See: credobaptism – believer’s baptism Resources On This Site: BAPTISMC Calvinism The system of doctrines and belief of John Calvin aka Jean Caulvin or Cauvin or Chauvin, 1509-1564, French Protestant Reformation leader. The beliefs dominated by predestination and election to salvation of an individual solely on the basis of God’s sovereign will and grace. The beliefs being signified by the acrostic, TULIP, meaning: Total depravity of man, being dead in sins and unable to respond to the spiritual, Unconditional election or choice of men to salvation by God, Limited atonement for sins for the elect only, Irresistible grace which man cannot reject, Perserverence of the saints (the elect), continuing in the faith until death. Resources On This Site: JOHN CALVINcatechism (Latin) A system by which religious principles and beliefs are taught through a series of questions and answers, many answers accompanied by references to Scripture verses. Resources On This Site: CATECHISMS & CREEDS charismatic (Greek) Christian Reconstructionism communion (Latin) consubstantiation (Latin) covenant theology credobaptism (Latin) D deism (Latin) A system of religious belief that assumes the existence of a god who created the heavens, earth and man and then withdrew himself from that creation. The god of the Deist cannot be known in a personal manner and the revelation of God claimed by Christians is rejected. Deists base many of their beliefs on Christian principles, but do so without foundation because they assume beliefs that they deny can be known.dispensationalism (Latin) The system of belief that God has dealt with humanity through various “dispensations” or divisions of time in which certain elements are present in one dispensation and not in another. Dispensations are related in kind, but not in content and various elements of one dispensation do not relate to those of another dispensation unless Scripture specifically states the fact. Such dispensational divisions are subject to definition by the proponent of belief and may differ from one teacher, group or church to the other. Some dispensational divisions might include but are not limited to: Dispensation of Innocence (Adam), Dispensation of Conscience (Pre-flood), Dispensation of Government (Noah), Dispensation of Law (Moses), Dispensation of Grace (Current day). Resources On This Site: DISPENSATIONALISM doctrine (Latin) dogma (Latin) Dominion Theology (Latin) dualism (Latin) E ecclesiology (Greek) The study of the assembly. In theology, the study of the church, defined as the body of those who believe in Christ, and all of the various aspects of that body. Resources On This Site: CHURCHeffectual calling Those who are called by God, will and must come to salvation by faith. Similar to the irresistible grace taught by John Calvin. eisegesis (Greek) election (Latin) eschatology (Greek) exegesis (Greek) expiate (Latin) G glorification (Latin) To exalt and honor. In relation to Jesus Christ, His exaltation to the right hand of the Father after His resurrection. In relation to the believing Christian, their exaltation to heaven and into the presence of God.gnostic (Greek) Meaning knowledge. A system of religious belief in which elements from various religious systems are combined into one. The adherents claiming that intuitive knowledge is all that is necessary to obtain their definition of salvation. Gnosticism is the parent of rationalism in which a person claims that God can be known through the rational thinking of a person rather than through revelation. Because of its rejection of revelation and the definition of God in the Scripture, Gnosticism is considered heresy. Gospel of Inclusion grace (Latin) H hermeneutics (Greek) To interpret. The interpretation of Biblical texts. The study of the principles of Biblical exegesis. The standards by which Biblical texts are studied and their meanings determined through exegesis – meaning from within the text. A specific hermeneutic is determined by a specific set of principles which are applied to that hermeneutic. There are many hermeneutics, depending on who wishes to do the interpretation and the principles applied which suit the interpretation that is wished to support. A hermeneutic based on principles applied from outside the text is an eisegetical hermeneutic, in which the text itself looses its own authority and integrity, and meaning is assigned based on elements from outside the text which it is claimed apply.hypostasis (Greek) To cause to stand, a supporting or foundation. In theology, the unique nature of the Godhead, pertaining to any of the three Persons of the Godhead. In relation to Jesus Christ, his personality as distinguished from His two natures, divine and human. i.e. hypostatic union: the unity of the Godhead as to three Persons in One. I illumination (Latin) To brighten, clarify or explain. In relation to religion, it is not a direct revelation from God, but is a result of careful study, prayer and the action of the Holy Spirit in which a believer is given the ability to understand the spiritual matters. Illumination is given in measure to every believer.incarnation (Latin) The process and means by which Jesus Christ, as Deity, entered the stream of humanity and took on the nature of humanity through His birth. Resources On This Site: JESUS CHRIST infralapsarianism (Latin) inspiration (Latin) J justification (Latin) The act of God in which He pardons sinful men and declares them just and guiltless. It is a judicial act and pronouncement, assigning the righteousness (rightness) of Jesus Christ to the sinful believer who has believed in Christ for salvation, and thus the individual is placed in a right relationship with God. Resources On This Site: JUSTIFICATIONK kenosis (Greek) An emptying. In theology, the act of Jesus humbling himself through the inclusion of the nature and form of a human being.Kingdom Now In relation to theology, a version of Dominion Theology, teaching that the Christian church will eventually dominate all secular institutions of government. Having its roots primarily in Pentecostal beliefs, it has embraced much of the teaching of E.W. Kenyon plagiarized by Kenneth Hagin, and is now incorporated into the Positive Confession, Word of Faith doctrines taught by Kenneth Copeland, Jesse Duplantis, Bishop Earl Paulk, Robert Tilton, Charles Capps, Benny Hinn, Frederick K.C. Price and popularized on TBN by Paul Crouch. A basic premise is that the church will become mature and united under apostles and prophets (such as Bishop Earl Paulk) at which time it will display its power and take control of governmental authority worldwide, even asserting that the members of the church will eventually attain to immortality as a result of the maturity obtained. Most of the above mentioned proponents adopt the “little gods” belief, teaching that Christians can, at maturity, become “little gods” or members of the “God-class”. Because of its belief in the ascendancy of man, the idea that the church is the incarnation of Christ on earth and the adoption of the belief that human beings can become gods, Kingdom Now Theology is considered heretical. See: Dominion Theology See: Kingdom Now Theology See: Reconstructionism – Christian L lordship (Old English) The belief that unless a person is willing to acknowledge and accept the Lordship of Christ over their life, they cannot be a Christian. Known also as “Lordship salvation”. The subject is a major point of difference among Christians today. Resources On This Site: JESUS CHRIST LORDSHIPM Modalsim Similar to Sabellianism or Monarchianism. The belief that the persons of the Godhead are modes or manifestations of one God. It is a belief that there is one God, but there are no separate persons of Jesus Christ or the Holy Spirit. The second and third persons of the Godhead are modes or manifestations of the one God, in which God reveals Himself in different forms which take on different characteristics or appearances. Because Modalism, Sabellianism and Monarchianism deny the existence and personality of Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit, they are considered to be heretical beliefs. See: Sabellianism Resources On This Site: TRINITYmonotheism (Greek) Meaning a singular god. As applied to Christianity and Judaism, it is the belief that God is one singular entity expressed in three persons (Trinity). Monotheistic belief can be expressed in relation to the true God or in relation to a false God. O omnipotent (Latin) The state of being all powerful. In relation to God, He has all power in heaven and earth. His power is not diminished by any accomplishment including the creation of the heaven and the earth. He can do and accomplish anything that He chooses at any time and in any manner.omnipresence (Latin) The state of being all present. In relation to God who is everywhere in the universe at the same time. The Scripture states that He fills the heavens and the earth. God does not have boundaries or limitations and He is wherever there can be found a place. omniscience (Latin) open theism ordinances (Middle English) P paedobaptism (Greek) Baptism (sprinkling) of children, usually as an infant soon after birth. Practiced by Reformed churches and the Catholic church. Practiced by Reformed churches as a result of an interpretation of covenant belief that the baptism confers, to the child, entry and identification with the covenant, the church and, in some beliefs, grants salvation. Based on the theory that circumcision in the Old Testament corresponds to baptism in the New Testament. This belief is rejected by other protestant churches, including most Baptist churches, as being a belief based on a fundamentally flawed view of covenant theology and connection of circumcision to baptism that is not supported by the Scripture. See: baptism See: credobaptism – believer’s baptism Resources On This Site: BAPTISMpantheism (Greek) Meaning all. A term coined in by J. Toland in 1705, expressing the idea that God is not a personality, but that all things are god and part of god. Therefore god is all and all is god. It is a false system of belief. paraclete (Greek) paradigm (Greek) parthenogenesis (Greek) Pelagianism polytheism (Greek) post-millennial (Latin) post-tribulation (Latin) pre-incarnate (Latin) pre-millennial (Latin) preterism (Latin) propitiation (Latin) providence (Latin) R Reconstructionism To rebuild, reform or make over. In relation to doctrine, to redefine traditional and orthodox doctrine by a different set of criteria or definitions. To adopt eschatological views based on Theonomy, Dominion Theology or Reconstruction Theology, in which these groups claim that it is the duty and goal of the Christian church to recapture every human institution and government agency by means of the establishing of Christian individuals in leadership. This “reconstruction” of human social institutions will result in the gradual establishment of a world-wide Christian society and will cause the world to become better and better, morally and spiritually, eventually ushering in the return of Jesus Christ to set up His kingdom. Reconstruction Theology began in the mid-1960’s and has been popularized by individuals such as Rousas John Rushdoony (Chalcedon Foundation, California), Gary North (Institute for Christian Economics, Texas), Dr. Greg Bahnsen, Rev. Joseph Morecraft, David Chilton, Gary DeMar and Kenneth Gentry. Reconstructionism is not to be confused with Kingdom Now Theology, although they have much in common and also significant differences, however they are both classified under the label of Dominion Theology. Reconstruction Theology is not necessarily heretical, but is to be considered doctrinal error. See: Theonomy See: Dominion Theology See: Kingdom Now Theologyredemption (Latin) In the sense of a buying back from the possession of another or a release from an obligation or contract. A payment made by which such a release is obtained. Applied to Jesus Christ as the “Redeemer” of mankind from judgment for their sins, by His death on the cross in payment for the penalty of those sins. The redemption payment is validated through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, which guarantees and assures that the payment by Jesus Christ was sufficient and acceptable to God. Resources On This Site: REDEMPTION reformed (Latin) regeneration (Latin) revelation (Latin) S Sabellianism A type of Modalism or Monarchianism. The belief that the persons of the Godhead are modes or manifestations of one God. It is a belief that there is one God, but there are no separate persons of Jesus Christ or the Holy Spirit. The second and third persons of the Godhead are modes or manifestations of the one God, in which God reveals Himself in different forms which take on different characteristics or appearances. Because Sabellianism, Modalism and Monarchianism deny the existence and personality of Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit, they are considered to be heretical beliefs. See: Modalism Resources On This Site: TRINITYsanctification (Latin) To set apart, cleanse or purify. It is that action which God performs within the believer as to changing the nature and character of the person. There is instantaneous sanctification which occurs at the point of salvation, by which God sees the believer as clean and pure because of the covering work of Jesus Christ. There is progressive sanctification by which a believer, through a continual process is transformed into the image of Jesus Christ, through dedication, study of the Bible, consciousness of sin and action by the Holy Spirit. There is final sanctification, in which the believer will be mature in character, body and spirit and occurs at the coming of Jesus Christ, whether that happens at the death of the person or the actual second coming of Christ for His church. Resources On This Site: SANCTIFICATION semi-Pelagianism separation (Latin) sine qua non(Latin) sola fide (Latin) sola gratia (Latin) sola scriptura (Latin) soli Deo gloria (Latin) solo Christo (Latin) soteriology (Greek) sovereignty (Middle English, Old French) sublapsarianism (Latin) supralapsarianism (Latin) T theodicy (Greek) Word coined in 1710 by Baron Gottfried Leibnitz (1646-1716), German philosopher and mathematician. The study of the origin of sin in relation to the Divine justice of God in allowing it to exist.Theonomy (Greek) Known also as “Dominion Theology” and “Christian Reconstructionism” and is a theological interpretation regarding ecclesiology and eschatology. Primarily asserts that all governments will be progressively dominated by Christians, at some point that domination being so complete that it will usher in the kingdom of Jesus Christ. The church builds the kingdom and Jesus Christ simply appears to sit on the throne. There are various levels of belief in this theology, some stating that the world will become progressively better and more Christian through the proclamation of the gospel, and others adopt the view that Christians must become more militant and take positions in government in order to establish religious morality through law. Virtually all proponents of these theological views also adopt a post-millennial stance regarding the second coming of Jesus Christ for the church and propose some type of amillennial or spiritual millennial interpretation of the thousand year reign of Jesus Christ. See: Reconstructionism – Christian See: Dominion Theology theophany (Latin – Greek) therianthropic (Greek) transubstantiation (Latin) Trinity (Latin – Greek) END OF THEOLOGICAL TERMINOLOGY |
Posted in Uncategorized
Bad Hermeneutics (John MacArthur)
Best example I ever heard of bad (really BAD!) hermenutics was the preacher who wanted to preach against women’s hair being put up in a bun — he thought it should be worn down as it naturally hung. Why he had some affinity for this position I will never know, but he did and preached a sermon entitled ” Top Knot Come Down ” and ,you guessed it, used Matt 24: 17 as his text. It reads in the KJV ” let him who is on the housetop not come down… “
I rest my case as to this being the worst of all time !
Posted in Uncategorized